If you are having trouble keeping your percentages low, then you need to use variations of the main keyword. Not only will this keep you safe, but it will actually help your page rank for variations of your keyword. Target only ONE page for your keywords: If you decide to keep an inner page for targeting your keyword, then change the META information on the duplicate page to avoid keyword dilution.
Is the obvious explanation always true?
Does that make sense? Otherwise, the mobile phone conversation can swerve too close to baseless so far conspiracy theories that seem more fiction than fact. I have draw no conclusions, just a feeling. Which I realize probably has no scientific merit. I have a fairly organized mind as well. Do you have any conclusive evidence in a different direction.
Not sure about the echo chamber comment. I am open to any explanation on this topic. If anyone has thoughts, theoriesor concrete evidenceplease post. Mobile phones are being used to control people in some way Requirement 1: Wifi or telecoms signals must be emitted which affect the human brain in a specific way as to result in a change of behaviour Requirement 2: The resultant change is desired by some group or organization.
The link must be complex or just a few non-conspiracy member experts in X waves, communication or the human brain would realise and announce their findings. Mobile phone technology seems like a reasonable development alongside other technologies which have emerged radios, computers etc.
If behavioural changes are made by radio waves we would expect to see early experimenters with this technology reporting such behaviours. If small behavioural changes are being made by mobile phone use then would we see large changes around intense signals?
Beyond mobile phones themselves large amounts of radio and wifi signals are not considered hazardous, Radar has been used for decades and you can approach a radar tower without any special protection or ill effects. Areas of high intensity wifi signals likewise apartment blocks where every apartment has wifi, internet cafes etc are not associated with seizures or strange behaviours.
This does not preclude a non-radio or wifi signal being emitted by phones but a special hidden radiation seems like a stretch. The change would need to be subtle enough not to be noticed and large enough to be worth a considerable expenditure of resources and risk. We need something testable!
Radio and wifi signals i would suggest are well understood by a large number of groups from doctors to engineers to operatives in a number of fields. If radio or wifi signals DID effect changes in the human brain there would be applications for this in a variety of fields. Perhaps cures for some cognitive disorder or behavioural illnesses.
Could we look to cure diseases? Could we use such signals to calm rioters or increase spending in shops? I would like to share a simple mantra which I use when faced with any supernatural phenomenon.
I think this may, and hopefully will, offer some insight into the cell phone conundrum. This was previously posted under Major Memories and seems to fit well here. When you speak with someone outside of your home and your cell phone is with you make note of the conversation for the next hours without referring back to it at anytime.
Go to your personal laptop or computer and go to Yahoo. You may find that the topic you were speaking of shows up as a main article referencing the aforementioned.
Another experiment for measure: Walk away and come back maybe 10,15,30 minutes later. Another thing, the words that are used to get your attention are important. The English language is riddled with underlying suggestions etymology eliciting certain reactions.
That was not my intention.
You are obviously a better communicator than I am. I am not sure of anyone else posting on here, but I have no one to really bounce any of my ideas even if they are JUST ideas off of.
The people I know would probably think I was insane if I started talking about some of the things we do on here. I said in my initial post on this site, that it took me a LONG time to even be able to talk about the things I had noticed since for fear of being ridiculed, I actually thought I might be losing my mind.The Failure of Two-Factor Authentication.
Two-factor authentication isn't our savior. It won't defend against phishing.
It's not going to prevent identity theft. Found your blog the other day and have learned MUCH more than the previous blogs I had found combined. I see that you have an article about SEO secrets below but I was wondering if you can direct me to like an “SEO for idiots” type of thing I really need to understand the basics.
Which theories & explanations make the most sense? So far, the two leading theories are that we’re “sliding” between parallel (or similar) realities, or that we’ve visited holodecks (and may be in one, right now) that have some glitches. However, those concepts are broad.
I’ve been trying to . Another problem is that search engine rankings still aren’t as good as they should be. Sure, new algorithm evolutions like RankBrain help dramatically.. But we’re not out of the woods just yet. Google uses a multitude of factors to determine how to rank search engine results.
Typically, these factors are either related to the content of a webpage itself (the text, its URL, the titles and headers, etc.) or were measurements of the authenticity of the website itself (age of the domain name, number and quality of inbound links, etc.).
Joost de Valk is the founder and CEO of Yoast. He's a WordPress / Web developer, SEO and an Open Source fanatic. WordPress is one of the best, if not the best content management systems when it comes to SEO. That being said, spending time on your WordPress SEO might seem like a waste of time, it.