Griggs v duke power company

Facts[ edit ] Duke Power Company was a public utility corporation that was involved in the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electric power to the general public in North Carolina and South Carolina. Duke Power also supplied electric power to federal government agencies and, for that reason, was subject to an Executive Order that prohibited discrimination in employment. DavisUS is inapplicable.

Griggs v duke power company

Named the 9 fastest growing education company in the United States. Thank you for your support! United States Supreme Court U. Duke defendant maintained a policy of open discrimination against black employees. InDuke began requiring a high school degree for placement in any department other than labor and for transfer to any of the more desirable departments.

Griggs v duke power company

Beginning on July 2,the date on which the Civil Rights Act went in to effect, Duke added additional requirements. To be placed in any department other than labor or to be transferred to any inside department, Duke required passage of two aptitude tests in addition to the high school degree requirement.

The tests purportedly measured general intelligence but had no relation to job-performance ability. The court of appeals rejected the claim that because, in practice, the tests excluded a substantially disproportionate number of black employees, it violated Title VII.

The plaintiffs petitioned for review by the United States Supreme Court. Rule of Law Alert The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in. Issue Alert The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

Griggs v duke power company

Holding and Reasoning Burger, J. Alert The holding and reasoning section includes: A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section; A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and The procedural disposition e. What to do next… Unlock this case brief with a free no-commitment trial membership of Quimbee.

Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97, law students since Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

Read our student testimonials. Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: Read more about Quimbee.

Griggs v. Duke Power Co. Case Brief - Quimbee

Here's whylaw students have relied on our case briefs: Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.

Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions. Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief.Griggs (Plaintiff) was an African American employee of Duke Power Co.

(Defendant) who challenged Defendant’s job requirements as a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act because they disparately impacted African American applicants and were not . Griggs v.

Duke Power Co., case in which the U.S. Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision on March 8, , established the legal precedent for so-called “disparate-impact” lawsuits involving instances of racial discrimination. (“Disparate impact” describes a situation in which adverse effects.

Griggs v.

Search form

Duke Power Company was a landmark employment discrimination case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in It concerned the legality, under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of , of high school diplomas and intelligence test scores as prerequisites for employment.

Griggs v. Duke Power Co.

Griggs v. Duke Power - North Carolina History Project

(No. ) Argued: December 14, Decided: March 8, ___ and this proceeding was brought by a group of incumbent Negro employees against Duke Power Company. All the petitioners are employed at the Company's Dan River Steam Station, a power generating facility located at Draper, North Carolina.

United States Supreme Court GRIGGS v. DUKE POWER CO., () No. Argued: December 14, Decided: March 8, Negro employees at respondent's generating plant brought this action, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of , challenging respondent's requirement of a high school diploma or passing of intelligence tests as a condition of employment in or transfer to jobs at.

Griggs v. Duke Power Co., U.S. () Griggs v. Duke Power Co. No. and this proceeding was brought by a group of incumbent Negro employees against Duke Power Company. All the petitioners are employed at the Company's Dan River Steam Station, a power generating facility located at Draper, North Carolina. Griggs. . Griggs v. Duke Power Co., case in which the U.S. Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision on March 8, , established the legal precedent for so-called “disparate-impact” lawsuits involving instances of racial discrimination. (“Disparate impact” describes a situation in which adverse effects. United States Supreme Court GRIGGS v. DUKE POWER CO., () No. Argued: December 14, Decided: March 8, Negro employees at respondent's generating plant brought this action, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of , challenging respondent's requirement of a high school diploma or passing of intelligence tests as a condition of employment in or transfer to jobs at.

Named the #9 fastest growing education company in the United States. Thank you for your support! From our private database of 14,+ case briefs Griggs v. Duke Power Co. United States Supreme Court U.S. () Facts.

Griggs v. Duke Power Co. :: U.S. () :: Justia US Supreme Court Center